Patterns of Abuse: Gaslighting, Judicial Delay, and the Psychological Cost of Hostile Takeovers

Human rights violations are often measured in financial loss or years of imprisonment, but the HRPM datasets (Cases: HRPM-DTH20160, HRPM-MMAPAUUA, and HRPM-MLORJ30M) reveal a deeper pattern of psychological and emotional abuse. Through gaslighting, intimidation, and the weaponization of the legal system, state and non-state actors have inflicted severe harm on target individuals.

State-Sponsored Intimidation: The Thanvi Case

In HRPM-DTH20160, Danish Thanvi has faced more than a decade of 'systematic harassment.' The use of 'friendly visits' by individuals like Mobina Sohail after alleged thefts (FIR 673/25) is a classic tactic used to intimidate victims into silence. This psychological pressure is exacerbated by the involvement of regulatory bodies like NADRA and the FIA, creating a constant state of legal anxiety for the victim.

The Best Interest of the Child: Vetter v. Vetter

Case HRPM-MMAPAUUA (Vetter v. Vetter) highlights a different but equally damaging form of abuse: the denial of a child's right to their parent. The precedent 2026 ND 36 emphasizes that parenting time is a 'right of the child.' When legal arguments are not 'adequately articulated' or are 'deemed waived,' the child’s emotional health is endangered. The systemic failure to protect this right is a violation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Criminalization of Animal Welfare: Parishay Khan vs CDA

The case of Parishay Khan (HRPM-MLORJ30M) regarding the CDA Stray Dog Population Control Centre demonstrates how the state uses 'Criminal Charges under PPC' to label and isolate advocates. The repeated scheduling of hearings (February 20, 2026) without resolution is a form of 'justice delayed,' designed to emotionally exhaust the defendant.

Psychological Tactics in Corporate Fraud

At Background Check Group (HRPM-BCG20260), the syndicate used digital surveillance as a psychological tool. Knowing one is being watched through 'screen capture software' and seeing one's company dismantled in real-time while incapacitated by state trials constitutes a high-severity human rights violation under ICCPR Article 17 (Right to Privacy).

Findings and Recommendations

The international community must recognize 'legal harassment' as a form of psychological torture under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Mechanisms must be established to prevent the 'weaponization' of FIRs and regulatory audits. Read the full case files on HRPM.