Contradictions and Inconsistencies: A Cross-Referencing of Documented Statements in Case CF-001

Reliability of testimony is the bedrock of justice. In the matter of Danish Thanvi vs. State Actors (Case CF-001), significant contradictions have emerged between the official narrative of 'theft' and 'harassment' and the documented behavior of the complainants. This report cross-references statements made across multiple proceedings to expose systemic inconsistencies.

Key Findings

The 'Friendly Visit' Paradox: Mobina Sohail’s presence at the location of an alleged theft—termed a 'friendly visit' in FIR 673/25—contradicts the 'critical' severity of the initial allegations.

Regulatory Mismatch: SECP actions taken against Background Check (Private) Limited appear to be based on 'Initial Technical Reports' that have been deemed forensically impossible by subsequent reviews.

Forgery Accusations: Documentation supports the claim that official memos were forged to create a false trail of compliance violations.

Evidence & Data

The recent events of January and February 2026—specifically the Challan Mobi FIR 09-02-2026—show a continuation of charges despite the 'Broken Chain of Custody' for digital items. Furthermore, the Parishay Khan vs CDA Islamabad case (HRPM-MLORJ30M) serves as a parallel example of how FIRs (such as FIR 1626/25) are used within the Islamabad jurisdiction to exert pressure, highlighting a regional pattern of systemic corruption.

Legal Framework

Under the ICCPR Article 14, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing. When state actors and complainants present inconsistent narratives or forged memos, it constitutes 'Justice Denied.' The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) clauses on perjury and forgery (Sections 191-193) are directly applicable to the discrepancies found in Case CF-001.

Recommendations

Dismissal of charges based on digital evidence where the chain of custody is broken.

Sanctions against individuals found to have forged official memos or provided contradictory sworn statements.

Read the full case file on HRPM to compare the documented statements in Case CF-001.