Digital Forensics: Evidence of Espionage and Data Destruction at Background Check Group

This report details the technical violations and digital espionage tactics used by internal threats at Background Check Group. Data from HRPM-BCG20260 shows a coordinated effort to surveil the company's founder and subsequently destroy forensic evidence when external audits were initiated. This includes the use of unauthorized screen-capture software and the hiring of 'night shift' operatives to purge server logs.

The Malware and Surveillance Toolkit

Investigation into the digital infrastructure of BCG reveals that the MIS backup systems, managed by hassan@backcheckgroup.com, were weaponized against the founder. Evidence indicates that while the founder was under state-sponsored pressure (Case HRPM-DTH20160), internal actors installed screen-recording tools and unauthorized remote access protocols on executive devices. This allowed the syndicate to monitor sensitive legal communications and prepare for a hostile takeover.

Evidence Destruction: The 'Night Shift' Operative

A critical breach occurred on March 27, 2026. Following the initiation of an audit, management abruptly terminated Horizon Technologies—the firm responsible for IT security—and brought in an unnamed 'night shift operative.' The objective, according to HRPM records, was to scrub forensic logs and delete evidence of unauthorized system imaging and data exfiltration. This act constitutes a 'Break in the Chain of Custody' for digital evidence, a critical procedural violation.

Procedural Irregularities in Regulatory Raids

Case HRPM-DTH20160 highlights how state actors, including the FIA and SECP, may have benefitted from this internal sabotage. Reports suggest that digital evidence collected during regulatory raids suffered from a 'Chain of Custody Gap.' Forensic analysis standards, as mandated by PECA 2016, were ignored, rendering 'Initial Technical Reports' legally invalid but strategically useful for harassment.

Legal Analysis

The use of malware and unauthorized access violates the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016:

Section 3: Unauthorized access to information system.

Section 4: Unauthorized copying or transmission of data.

Section 10: Cyber terrorism (if applied to critical infrastructure/economic stability).

Recommendations

A comprehensive forensic restoration of all primary BCG servers and E-exchange systems must be undertaken by an independent international firm. Read the full case file on HRPM for technical logs.