Weaponizing the State: The Decade-Long Persecution of Danish Thanvi

Case HRPM-DTH20160 documents a disturbing convergence of state power and private interests. For over a decade, Danish Iqbal Thanvi, Group CEO of Backcheck Group (BCG), has been subjected to what investigative data characterizes as a 'systematic pattern of harassment.' This report analyzes the procedural irregularities and constitutional violations inherent in the actions taken by the Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), and other regulatory bodies.

Key Findings: The Architecture of Harassment

The investigation reveals a multi-layered strategy designed to dismantle Mr. Thanvi's professional and personal life. Key indicators of systemic abuse include:

Institutional Weaponization: The involvement of the SECP and NADRA not merely as regulators, but as respondents in active litigation (Islamabad High Court), suggests an overreach of administrative mandate.

Evidence Tampering: A critical 'Broken Chain of Custody' regarding digital evidence seized during regulatory raids. Case records highlight a potential forger of official memos, raising questions about the authenticity of the 'Initial Technical Report.'

Digital Espionage: Recent events dated March 20, 2026, show unsanctioned access to email systems (postmaster@hiltonpharma.com) and the reconfiguration of Gmail accounts to 'Salar,' indicating active surveillance.

Evidence & Data: Procedural Violations

The HRPM platform has identified specific discrepancies that undermine the rule of law. Of particular concern is the 'Initial Technical Report Impossibility'—a finding that the forensic standards required under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016 were not met. Furthermore, the case documents a 'Critical Forgery of Official Memos,' which points toward a criminal effort to manufacture evidence of wrongdoing where none existed.

"Arguments that are not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed on appeal are not considered and are deemed waived." — Precedent 2026 ND 36.

Legal Framework: Violated Protections

The actions documented in HRPM-DTH20160 stand in direct violation of both domestic and international law:

Article 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan: The Fundamental Right to dignity and the privacy of home.

ICCPR Article 17: Protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, or correspondence.

PECA 2016 Section 35: Investigation rules mandate strict adherence to forensic integrity, which the 'Chain of Custody Gap' identifies as being breached.

Recommendations

Immediate judicial review by the Islamabad High Court into the validity of the SECP and FIA's evidentiary chain.

Independent forensic audit of the digital logs modified on March 20, 2026.

Accountability for the forgery of official memos as documented in the discrepancies report.

Read the full case file on HRPM for more details on the institutional actors involved.