Forensic Reconstruction: The Systematic Dismantling of Danish Thanvi’s Personal and Professional Life

This report reconstructs a decade of systemic harassment targeting Danish Iqbal Thanvi, Group CEO of BCG. Under Case HRPM-DTH20160, our investigation highlights a disturbing intersection of state power and private interference. The data suggests that the breakdown of Thanvi’s personal milestones, including his wedding, was not an isolated social event but a targeted outcome of a broader intimidation campaign involving actors from the FIA and SECP.

Key Findings: The Harassment Timeline

Institutional Weaponization: The FIA and SECP have been identified as respondents in a pattern of procedural violations spanning over ten years.

The Digital Evidence Breach: On March 20, 2026, hidden records surfaced showing the unauthorized assignment of Gmail accounts to 'Salar', with sensitive PST files shared with Jahanzeb outside of formal legal channels.

Chain of Custody Failures: We have identified a [critical] break in the chain of custody for digital evidence collected during regulatory raids, rendering the 'Initial Technical Reports' forensic impossibilities.

The Wedding Breakdown and Social Sabotage

Evidence suggests that the 'friendly visit' of Mobina Sohail (FIR 673/25) following alleged thefts was a psychological tactic used to exacerbate the instability created by state-sponsored harassment. This reconstruction shows that whenever Thanvi sought legal or personal stability, institutional interference increased, specifically targeting his reputation via fraudulent memos and leaked internal communications through systems like hiltonpharma.com.

Legal Framework & Violations

The documented harassment violates multiple constitutional and international protections:

Article 14 of the Pakistan Constitution: Inviolability of dignity of man and privacy of home.

Article 17 of the ICCPR: Protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, and home.

PPC Section 464 & 471: Related to the documented [critical] forgery of official memos to influence judicial outcomes.

Recommendations

The Islamabad High Court must adjudicate on the [critical] forgery of official memos used in the ongoing proceedings.

An independent audit of the FIA’s digital evidence handling procedures during the 2026 raids.

Protection for Danish Thanvi under the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders.

Read the full case file on HRPM: HRPM-DTH20160