Pattern of Deception: Forensic Analysis of Evidence in the Danish Thanvi Harassment Case

Case CF-001 identifies Danish Iqbal Thanvi as a victim of systematic harassment powered by deceptive practices. This report analyzes behavioral red flags and evidentiary anomalies, including the FIR 673/25 involving Mobina Sohail and the documented forgery of official state memos used to justify regulatory interference.

Key Findings

The 'Friendly Visit' Anomaly: FIR 673/25 records a supposed 'friendly visit' by Mobina Sohail following an alleged theft, a behavior pattern flagged by investigators as contradictory to standard victim-witness conduct.

Document Forgery: HRPM data confirms 'Critical' severity discrepancies regarding the forgery of official memos by state actors to fabricate a paper trail for business interference.

Technical Fabrications: The 'Initial Technical Report' cited by the prosecution is technically impossible according to forensic standards, suggesting a deceptive attempt to bypass legal requirements.

Evidence & Data

The HRPM platform documents that Mohammad Imran Haroon and Scott Graham (IntegraScreen) were involved in the peripheries of these events. The timeline shows a transition from business disputes to state-sponsored pressure. Specific focus is placed on the Challan Mobi FIR 09-02-2026, which remains part of an active investigation despite the integrity of the underlying digital evidence being compromised.

Legal Framework

Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) Section 465: Punishment for forgery, relevant to the 'Critical' discrepancy of forged memos.

ICCPR Article 17: Protection against unlawful attacks on honor and reputation, violated by the decade-long smear campaign against the Group CEO of BCG.

UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC): Specifically regarding the abuse of functions by regulatory authorities like the SECP.

Recommendations

Criminal prosecution of the individuals responsible for the forgery of official memos within the respondent institutions.

A judicial review of the 'friendly visit' evidence in FIR 673/25 to determine the extent of coercive or manipulative behavior.

Read the full case file on HRPM to investigate the documented behavioral anomalies.