Digital Forgery and the 'Initial Technical Report' Impossibility: Contradictions in Case CF-001

In the ongoing matter of Danish Thanvi vs. Multiple State Actors (Case CF-001), deep-seated contradictions between official witness testimonies and material evidence have emerged. This investigation focuses on the forensic discrepancies surrounding digital evidence handled by the FIA and SECP. Findings suggest a systematic effort to manufacture evidence, specifically regarding 'Initial Technical Reports' that defy standard forensic timelines and the documented forgery of official memos intended to influence judicial outcomes.

Key Findings

Forensic Anomaly: The submission of an 'Initial Technical Report' by the FIA, which under standard operating procedures and international forensic standards, could not have been produced within the timeframe claimed given the volume of seized hardware.

Official Forgery: Documentation within the HRPM platform indicates critical discrepancies in official memos, pointing toward the criminal offense of forgery as defined under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

Testimony vs. Reality: Witness statements from regulatory raids on Background Check (Private) Limited (BCG) conflict with later depositions regarding the handling of digital assets.

Evidence & Data: The Forgery of Memos

Data from Case CF-001 reveals a pattern where official memos were allegedly backdated or altered to justify regulatory overreach. Specifically, the role of Officer Khalid Hussain (FIA) and ASP Maria Khan in supervising these processes has come under scrutiny. The 'Initial Technical Report' cited in the Challan Mobi FIR (09-02-2026) lacks the digital signature and chain of custody metadata required for admissibility in court. Furthermore, the presence of Mobina Sohail during what was described as a 'friendly visit' after an alleged theft (FIR 673/25) creates a narrative contradiction that undermines the state's claim of a neutral investigation.

Legal Framework

The documented discrepancies violate several national and international laws:

PECA 2016 Investigation Rules: Failure to maintain the digital chain of custody.

Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984: Article 78-A regarding the requirement of authentication for electronic records.

ICCPR Article 14: The right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence.

UDHR Article 12: Protection against arbitrary interference with privacy and correspondence.

Recommendations

An independent forensic audit of all digital evidence submitted by the FIA in Case CF-001.

Immediate suspension of officials identified in the 'Forgery of Official Memos' discrepancy report pending a judicial inquiry.

Dismissal of evidence where the chain of custody (as noted in HRPM records) has been critically broken.

Read the full case file on HRPM for Case CF-001.