The PIL Registry: Why We Are Repositioning HRPM for Journalists, Regulators, and Counsel

# The PIL Registry: Why We Are Repositioning HRPM HRPM.org began as an evidence and timeline platform. Over the past months, the people actually using it have told us something useful: the platform is most powerful when it serves three audiences at once. - **Journalists** who need cite-able facts and clear chronology - **Regulators** who need statutory mapping and defensible source trails - **Legal counsel** who need court-ready exports and consistent annex numbering So we are repositioning HRPM as a **Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Registry**. ## What changes - **Paper-first aesthetic.** Deep navy, parchment, burgundy, gold — a calm legal palette designed for long reading sessions and high-stakes filings. - **Allegation-framed language.** Every case page uses neutral, court-safe terminology mapped to PPC, PECA, and AMLA where relevant. - **Canonical report shell.** Case PDFs, regulator dossiers, and FIR filings now share one A4 template with a *Strictly Confidential* footer. - **Audience-aware dashboards.** Journalist, Regulator, and Legal Counsel views surface the widgets each role actually uses. ## What stays the same - Open access to public-interest material - Source-cited, evidence-backed entries — no actor attribution without basis - A defensive, awareness-focused posture across every page ## What is next We are continuing to consolidate older case files under the canonical template, expanding the multilingual awareness blog, and shipping additional regulator-grade exports. The goal is simple: make it faster for the three audiences above to find the information they need, in a form they can act on. *Published by HRPM.org — Documenting injustice. Demanding accountability.*