Procedural Anomalies in Pakistan’s Justice System: A Legal Framework Analysis of Case CF-001 and HRPM-MLORJ30M

This report analyzes the legal discrepancies found in Case CF-001 (Danish Thanvi) and Case HRPM-MLORJ30M (Parishay Khan vs CDA). Examining the intersection of Pakistan’s Penal Code (PPC) and international conventions, we identify a recurring pattern where the state ignores mandatory procedural safeguards to secure convictions or maintain detentions.

Key Findings

Evidence Integrity: In Case CF-001, there is a critical discrepancy regarding the 'Broken Chain of Custody' for digital items, violating the standards for forensic analysis.

Regulatory Malpractice: The SECP’s actions following 'Illegitimate Termination' suggest a coordinated effort to bypass employment law and corporate governance standards.

Criminalization of Civil Matters: The filing of FIR 1626/25 against Parishay Khan regarding the CDA Stray Dog Population Control Centre incident represents a high-severity escalation of local administrative disputes into criminal proceedings.

Comparative Analysis: Domestic Law vs. International Conventions

The documented violations in these cases demonstrate a departure from established norms:

"Standards for forensic analysis, expertise requirements, and admissibility of evidence appear systematically ignored in Case CF-001."

UDHR Article 12: Protection against arbitrary interference with privacy and professional life is undermined by the 'Regulatory Raids' documented in Case CF-001.

CrPC Section 173: The submission of Challan for Farzana Bashir (Case HRPM-MLORJ30M) before Ahtsham Muqarrab indicates a rush to trial that may bypass the necessity for a fair preliminary inquiry.

PECA 2016 Rules: The failure to follow investigate rules by FIA officers violates the statutory protections granted to technology-based businesses in Pakistan.

Evidence of Forgery and Perjury

A 'critical' discrepancy found in the HRPM platform data for CF-001 involves the 'Forgery of Official Memos.' Under the Pakistan Penal Code, forgery by state actors carries significant penalties, yet these memos remain part of the active investigative record under Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro and Justice Rashid Mahmood. This points to a systemic crisis where the instruments of justice are used to authenticate fraudulent evidence. Read the full case file on HRPM for the complete list of procedural violations.