Justice Denied: Constitutional Violations in the Persecution of Danish Thanvi

In the case of Vetter v. Vetter (HRPM-MMAPAUUA) and the broader persecution of Danish Thanvi (HRPM-DTH20160), a fundamental breakdown of the legal framework is evident. This report examines the specific constitutional protections denied to Thanvi and how the dismantling of judicial independence in Pakistan has facilitated a decade of human rights abuses.

Key Findings

Denial of Parenting Rights: Based on the precedent 2026 ND 36, the state has failed to protect the child's right to parenting time, which is a presumption in law unless 'endangerment' is proven by a preponderance of evidence.

Abuse of Regulatory Power: The FIA and SECP failed to follow procedural mandates required under PEMRA laws, creating a environment of 'Legalized Harassment.'

Judicial Interference: The context of the 27th Amendment provides a shield for military-executive overreach, as seen in the parallel persecution in HRPM-MLSI7M88.

Evidence & Data

The 'Critical' severity rating of digital evidence discrepancies—specifically the Forgery of Official Memos—highlights a total collapse of evidentiary standards. When institutions like the Islamabad High Court are presented with forged memos as ‘proof,’ and the judicial system is too compromised to strike them down, the constitutional right to a fair trial (Article 10-A) becomes a fiction.

Legal Framework

The cumulative actions against Thanvi violate the Convention against Torture (CAT) (specifically psychological torture through legal limbo) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) regarding the restriction of parenting time without evidentiary basis. Domestically, these acts violate the Pakistan Constitution, Articles 4, 9, 10-A, and 25 (Equality of Citizens).

Recommendations

An immediate stay on all proceedings where 'Chain of Custody' gaps have been identified until an independent forensic audit is filed.

Restoration of parenting time rights for Danish Thanvi in accordance with the 'best interests of the child' standard set by 2026 ND 36.

International monitoring of the Islamabad High Court’s handling of these active corporate and personal cases.

Read the full case file on HRPM: HRPM-DTH20160, HRPM-MMAPAUUA.