Legal Framework Review: Forgery and Perjury in Case CF-001 vs. International Compliance

The integrity of the legal system relies on the authenticity of state records. In Case CF-001 involving Danish Thanvi and the FIA, HRPM has documented critical discrepancies regarding the forgery of official memos and perjury. This investigation analyzes how these breaches of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) align with violations of international law.

Key Findings

Forgery of Evidence: Documented instances of forged official memos utilized to justify regulatory actions by the SECP.

Chain of Custody Failure: A high-severity violation where digital evidence integrity was not maintained, rendering FIR 09-02-2026 procedurally suspect.

Regulatory Misconduct: Failure of the SECP and NADRA to provide legitimate grounds for business interference following illegitimate terminations.

Evidence & Data

Case CF-001 identifies Justice Rashid Mahmood and Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro as presiding authorities over matters where these discrepancies were raised. The 'Challan Mobi' file from February 9, 2026, is a key piece of evidence that lacks a verifiable 'Initial Technical Report.' Under the CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure), the submission of a challan based on forged or technically impossible reports constitutes a gross miscarriage of justice.

Legal Framework

PPC Section 463-471 (Forgery): The alleged creation of false documents to cause damage to Danish Thanvi's business reputation.

PPC Section 193 (Perjury): Potential charges against officers who provided false evidence in judicial proceedings.

ICCPR Article 14(3): The right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of a defense, which is impossible when evidence is manufactured.

Recommendations

Immediate forensic validation of the 'Challan Mobi FIR 09-02-2026' by a non-government third party.

Accountability for Officer Khalid Hussain regarding the 'Broken Chain of Custody' findings.

A stay on all SECP actions until the Islamabad High Court concludes the inquiry into the forged memos.

Read the full case file on HRPM to view the specific discrepancies regarding official memo authenticity.